Delovno razmerje za določen čas: primer iz prakse

Podjetje in delo

Predogled besedila

 

 

 

Povzetek: V članku je obravnavan primer javne uslužbenke, ki je bila na nekem slovenskem ministrstvu za določen čas zaposlena kar devet (9!) let. Organa delodajalca, ki odločata o delovnih razmerjih, nista ugodila njenemu zahtevku na ugotovitev, da je bila od sklenitve prve pogodbe o zaposlitvi v delovnem razmerju za nedoločen čas in da jo pristojni organ imenuje v ustrezen naziv in plačilni razred. Nato je sprožila delovni spor. Na sodišču prve stopnje je bila uspešna z zahtevkom na ugotovitev, da je bila v delovnem razmerju za nedoločen čas od 6. 12. 2006 dalje in da ji mora tožena stranka izročiti v podpis pogodbo o zaposlitvi z imenovanjem v naziv višji svetovalec III. Zavrnjen je bil zahtevek za imenovanje v naziv višji svetovalec I. Po pritožbi tožene stranke, odločitvi sodišča druge stopnje, predlogu tožnice za dopustitev revizije, delni dopustitvi revizije, odločbi revizijskega sodišča in ponovni odločbi višjega sodišča je bila tožnica uspešna le deloma. Ker je bilo dokazano nezakonito veriženje pogodb o zaposlitvi za določen čas, je bila tožnica tudi oškodovana. Kljub direktivam Evropske unije in odločbam Sodišča Evropske unije ni bilo odločeno o celotni škodi, ki je tožnici nastala. Ta obsega predvsem imenovanje v ustrezni naziv, razvrstitev v ustrezen plačilni razred, napredovanje in morebitne druge zahtevke zaradi nezakonitega veriženja pogodb o zaposlitvi. Ključne besede: delovno razmerje za določen čas, nezakonito veriženje pogodb, projektno delo, imenovanje v naziv, odškodnina Title: Fixed-Term Employment Relationship: A Practical Example Abstract: The article discusses the case of a civil servant who was employed by a certain Slovenian ministry for an indefinite period of time for nine (9) years. The employers'' bodies that decide on employment relationships did not comply with her claim for finding that she had been in an employment relationship for an indefinite period and that the competent authority appoints her in an appropriate title and salary grade. She then began a labour dispute. In the first-instance court she succeeded in claiming that she was in an employment relationship for an indefinite period from 6 December 2006, and also that the defendant must hand over an employment contract for signature for appointment to the post Senior Advisor I. The application for appointment to the title of senior Advisor I was rejected. The defendant filed an appeal. It was decided by the second-instance court. The complainant''s proposal for the admission of the revision was partially permitted. It was decided by the Court of Revision and by the second-instance court. The plaintiff succeeded partially. It has been proved that there has been an illegal chaining of fixed term employment contracts, and the claimant was therefore incurred damage. Despite the European Union directives and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the total damage caused to the claimant was not decided. The damage primarily consist of the appointment to the appropriate title, ranking in the appropriate salary class, advancing, and any other claims arising from the illegal chaining of employment contracts. Key words: fixed-term employment relationship, illegal chaining of contracts, project work, appointment to title, compensation


 

Celoten dokument je dostopen z veljavnim uporabniškim statusom.

Dostop do vsebin portala je mogoč:

> s sklenitvijo naročništva

 

 
 
Uporabniško ime:
Geslo:
 
   
  > Ste pozabili geslo?


 
 
 
Splošni pogoji | Izjava o varstvu podatkov